Here
are Standards proposed for DNA evidence as a research component with
reference to Genealogy Standards, 50th
Anniversary Edition (2014),
published by the Board for Certification of Genealogists. Having a
copy of Genealogy Standards at hand would be very useful for reviewing the items!
The
BCG Genetic Genealogy Standards Committee invites public comments on
the following draft (which also includes slight modifications to
existing Standards, reflected in the questionnaire). See below for
links. Thoughtful genealogists, please submit by 23 July 2018.
Proposed
Chapter 7: Using Genetic Evidence
All
work products reporting genealogical conclusions—including those
using DNA evidence—should meet the Genealogical Proof Standard and
all relevant standards. The following standards, specific to DNA, do
not stand alone. They are not the only standards that genealogists’
work should meet. Cross references identify the related existing,
published standards.
1.
DNA testing is:
• Selective.
Genealogists select DNA tests, testing companies, and analytical
tools with potential to address the genealogical research question.
• Targeted.
Genealogists target test takers based on their DNA’s potential to
answer a genealogical research question.
• Sufficiently
extensive. Genealogists examine the test results of a sufficient
number of test matches to draw conclusions about a relationship and
to analyze and eliminate competing hypotheses about the relationship
posed in the research question. Testing can involve any of at least
three groups:
a.
Test takers descended from a hypothesized common ancestor through
multiple lines of descent
b.
Test takers who descend from multiple possibilities for a common
ancestor
c.
Test takers selected to distinguish among shared segments pointing to
a common ancestor
[See
glossary for definitions of ANALYTICAL
TOOLS, COMMON ANCESTOR, CONCLUSION, DNA, HYPOTHESIS, RESEARCH
QUESTION, SHARED ANCESTRY ON MULTIPLE LINES, SHARED SEGMENTS,
and TEST MATCHES.]
[See
related Standards 9, 11, 15, 17, and 19.]
2.
Using DNA test results. Genealogists consider all available
relevant factors when they use DNA test results as a component of
proving a relationship. Those factors include reported and typical
amounts of shared DNA, sizes and locations of chromosomal segments,
information about mutations, markers or regions that have been
tested, number and genealogical expanse of people who were tested,
and genetic groups, including meaningful triangulated groups.
Genealogists
use valid tools and statistical algorithms from testing companies and
third parties to interpret test results and establish conclusions
about relationships or their absence. They cautiously form
conclusions about the absence of relationships. Genealogists do not
use DNA evidence to suggest genetic relationships beyond
theoretically possible levels.
[See
glossary for definitions of ALGORITHM,
DNA TEST RESULTS, GENETIC GROUPS, GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS, MARKER,
MUTATION, PROOF, REGIONS OF DNA, REPORTED AMOUNTS OF SHARED DNA,
SEGMENT INFORMATION, STATISTICAL PREDICTIONS OF RELATIONSHIPS,
TRIANGULATED GROUPS, and TYPICAL
AMOUNTS OF SHARED DNA.]
[See
related Standards 12, 45, and 40.]
3.
Identifying shared ancestry of DNA matches. Genealogists using
autosomal DNA both report and accommodate the possibility of shared
ancestry on multiple lines. The report addresses the accuracy, and
depth of test-takers’ pedigrees and assesses any gaps in those
pedigrees. Genealogists accommodate gaps by selecting one or more
strategies such as the following:
• Further
documentary research
• Additional
targeted testing
• Clear
explanation with justification for concluding that the gap is
irrelevant to the research question
• Segment
triangulation
• Analysis
of data from clustering and genetic networks
[See
glossary for definitions of GENETIC
NETWORK, PEDIGREE, SEGMENT TRIANGULATION, SHARED ANCESTRY, and
SHARED
ANCESTRY ON MULTIPLE LINES.]
[See
related Standards 17, 40, 42, and 45.]
4.
Replicability of DNA test results. Genealogical reports of DNA
test results enable others to assess their data and conclusions.
[See
glossary for definition of DNA
TEST RESULTS.]
[See
related Standard 3b.]
5.
Integrating DNA and documentary evidence. Genealogists use DNA
test results in conjunction with reasonably exhaustive documentary
research. They assess the merits and shortcomings of both documentary
and DNA evidence. They consider points of agreement and disagreement
between and within documentary and DNA evidence. They use those
assessments and comparisons to help resolve conflicts within their
evidence, including conflicts within DNA evidence and between it and
any documentary evidence.
[See
glossary for definitions of CONFLICTING
EVIDENCE and DNA
EVIDENCE.]
[See
related Standards 17, 19, 47, 48, and 50.]
The
full draft document is here:
https://bcgcertification.org/DNA/Proposed_Standards.pdfhttps://bcgcertification.org/DNA/Proposed_Standards.pdf
Comment
form (deadline 23 July 2018):
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXrc4f2khLwF4TzTSipAmrppS_wxfTI10IyTWYASqw6gJoBQ/viewformhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXrc4f2khLwF4TzTSipAmrppS_wxfTI10IyTWYASqw6gJoBQ/viewform
1 comment:
I (Brenda) just had to add this comment from a completely different medium and topic, Elizabeth Shown Mills on June 14th: "Proof still boils down to meeting the Genealogical Proof Standard. DNA is just one type of evidence. It's not a shiny new replacement for everything else."
Post a Comment